|
About the Project |
The Cultural Cognition Project is a group of scholars from
Yale and
other universities interested in studying how
cultural values shape the public's risk perceptions and related policy
beliefs. Cultural cognition refers to the tendency
of individuals to conform their beliefs about disputed matters of fact
(e.g., whether global warming is a serious threat; whether the death
penalty
deters murder; whether gun control makes society more safe or less) to
values that define their cultural identities. Project members are using
the methods
of various disciplines -- including social psychology, anthropology,
communications, and political science -- to chart the impact of this
phenomenon and to
identify the mechanisms through which it operates.
The Project also has an explicit normative objective: to identify
processes of democratic decisionmaking by which society
can resolve culturally grounded differences in belief in a manner that
is both congenial to persons of diverse cultural outlooks
and consistent with sound public policymaking.
|
Current Projects
|
The Second National Risk & Culture Study Americans are culturally polarized on a range of societal risks--from global warming to domestic terrorism, from school shootings to vaccination of school-age girls for HPV. Reporting the results of surveys and experiments involving some 5,000 Americans, the study identifies the causes of this condition and steps that can be taken to counteract it. [download study]
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Mechanisms of Cultural Cognition Supported by the National Science Foundation (Grant SES 0621840) and the Oscar M. Ruebhausen Fund at Yale Law School, Project members have been carrying out a series of experiments to identify the contributions that various psychological and social processes make to the phenomenon of cultural cognition.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Nanotechnology Risk Perceptions What do members of the public think about the benefits and risks of nanotechnology? How will their views evolve as they learn more? How can goverment promote informed public deliberations about this novel science? Project members are conducting experimental studies to answer these questions.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
|
Papers |
Based on a video shot from inside a police cruiser, the U.S. Supreme court concluded "no reasonable juror" could find that the risk posed by a fleeing motorist did not warrant deadly force (the deliberate ramming of his car) to stop him. But a study by the Cultural Cognition Project (forthcoming in the Harvard Law Review) finds that perceptions of risk among persons who viewed the tape were highly conditional on those persons' cultural worldviews. [ Download]
Is the controversy over the mandatory vaccination of school girls for HPV a cultural one? Yes, because what and whom individuals believe about the risks and benefits of the vaccine, experimental data show, are shaped by their cultural commitments. [Download]
The "white male effect" refers to the until-now unexplained tendency of white males to fear all manner of risk less than women and minorities. Published in the Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, this paper reports the results of an empirical study finding that that "the white male effect" derives from the tendency of individuals to form risk perceptions protective of identities they enjoy by virtue of cultural norms that feature race- and gender-differentiation in roles relating to putatively dangerous activities.
|
|
|